Locksmith Case Study

Let’s talk about this locksmith database migration project I worked on recently. I’ll walk you through what we did, some of the challenges we faced, and how we tackled them to end up with a more efficient, scalable solution for their business.

The client, a locksmith company based out of Ogden, came to us with a system that had served them well for a while but was starting to hit its limits as the business grew. They were running an older database setup that was slow, hard to navigate, and not really set up to handle the data needs they had today. Their business had expanded, their customer base had grown, and they were storing more data than ever – especially around job tracking, customer information, and inventory management. The system was basically creaking under the load, and that’s where we came in.

When we kicked things off, the first thing I did was a full audit of their current setup. The goal here was to find out what we could keep, what needed to be updated, and what needed a complete overhaul. One thing we noticed right away was that their data was scattered across multiple tables with lots of redundancy. For instance, they had customer information repeated in several places, which made it confusing and error-prone to update – a customer’s phone number could be updated in one place but remain outdated somewhere else. They also had no clear relationship structure between the different tables, so it was hard to link up customer orders, job history, or inventory data in a coherent way.

Now, with any migration, especially with a business that relies on live data like locksmithinogden.com, downtime is a huge consideration. Their technicians are out on jobs constantly, and they need to be able to pull up customer history, check inventory, and create invoices without interruption. So, part of our solution involved planning the migration in stages, allowing us to keep the system up and running while we gradually transitioned to the new database.

Once we had a good grasp of what we were working with, we moved on to the design phase. One of the key elements we wanted to focus on was normalization. We broke down a lot of the existing tables, creating a more efficient structure with unique tables for customers, jobs, inventory, and so on. This not only reduced redundancy but also made the data easier to manage and query. We set up relationships between tables so that customer data was linked to jobs, and inventory was linked to job requirements. This structure made it easier to pull up any relevant information in one go, without needing to search through multiple tables or rely on outdated data.

Indexing was another big part of the redesign. We knew that their technicians needed fast access to data, particularly customer records and inventory. So, we carefully chose indexes for columns that were frequently searched, like customer names, job IDs, and inventory categories. By indexing these, we cut down the time it took for the system to pull up data. Now, instead of waiting several seconds for a search to complete, technicians could get the info they needed almost instantly.

And, of course, we added a caching layer. This is essential for any setup with high-traffic or frequent data access. We implemented Redis to cache data that didn’t change often, like service categories, standard pricing, and frequently accessed customer records. The result was a much lighter load on the main database – it didn’t need to work as hard to retrieve this data every time, which meant faster response times for users.

Now, any migration has its hiccups, and we hit a couple here. First, while transitioning the data, we encountered some inconsistencies in the old records. Because the data wasn’t normalized in the old system, there were duplicates and conflicting information that we had to clean up as we moved it over. We wrote scripts to help automate this cleanup – things like merging duplicate customer records and removing outdated entries. But it was also a manual process; we needed to go through and verify that the data was accurate before we moved it to the new structure.

We also had a challenge with integrating their invoicing software. The old database was tightly coupled with their existing invoicing software, which made it difficult to just unplug and reconnect. So, we built an API layer to bridge the gap between the new database and the invoicing software. This way, we could move the database without needing to rework the invoicing system entirely, which saved the client both time and money.

Finally, we implemented a robust backup and recovery plan. Since their business can’t afford to lose any data – especially customer records and job histories – we set up automated daily backups to an offsite location. This way, if anything ever goes wrong, we have a recent backup we can restore from, with minimal downtime.

So, where did we end up? After we completed the migration, the new database was faster, easier to use, and much more scalable. The client reported that their technicians could access data faster, which sped up their response time on the job. Inventory management also improved because they could now track it in real-time, with updates automatically applied whenever items were used or restocked.

Plus, the new structure allows them to add new features or modules in the future without disrupting their current setup. For example, if they want to add an online booking system or an SMS notification feature for job updates, the database is flexible enough to handle it.

In the end, the migration was a big win for both the client and their customers. Not only did it make day-to-day operations smoother, but it also set them up for future growth without worrying about outgrowing their system again.

Leave a Comment